| dc.description.abstract | This study is about the extent of community participation in government-funded projects such as 
the Malawi Education Sector Improvement Programme (MESIP). Community participation 
rhetoric is given prominence in development projects initiated by Malawi government and other 
external agencies. The study employed convergent mixed methods research design to explore the 
nature and extent of community participation at all stages of the MESIP project cycle. The study 
also assessed factors affecting local people’s participation in government-funded projects such as 
MESIP. The study found that there was minimal involvement of community members during the 
needs assessment, identification of interventions, project planning, and monitoring and evaluation 
stages of MESIP. Government officials dominated decision-making and manipulated, instead of 
facilitating the development processes. However, the study noted that the participation of 
respondents in the project implementation stage was considerably high. The study, therefore, 
concluded that community participation in the MESIP project in Chasato Zone was up to the third 
rung of Arnstein's ladder of participation - Informing. Local people’s participation in MESIP was 
influenced by the level of awareness, level of income, people’s perception of MESIP, and some 
demographic factors such as marital status and religion, which influenced community participation 
in government-initiated MESIP. The study recommends that government programming should 
follow a bottom-up approach to ensure meaningful community participation right away from needs 
assessment to project evaluation stage. Involving community members from the initial stages of 
the project would improve people’s perception of the project thereby increasing their participation 
as well. The study also recommends the use of direct means of sharing information with local 
people to increase their participation. | en_US |